Lag screw or through bolt: what your beam is asking for
The one decision that gets made wrong most often, and the published numbers that settle it.
ABUSA
Every capacity figure on this site links here, because a number without its source is just a large font.
They are not the same kind of claim and they do not answer the same question. Reading them as one number is how a hanger rated on a rig turns into a promise about a beam nobody has looked at.
A casting pulled on a rig until it lets go, one hanger at a time, with the load straight down through the loop. Nobody drilled wood for that test.
Spacing, clear ground and fall surfaces for equipment on public land. It is guidance, not law for a backyard, and it gives no capacity number for hardware at all.
A consumer standard for home playground equipment sold as a set. It is voluntary, it is a paid document, and it is written around finished sets rather than a bag of hangers.
What a 4x6 carries over ten feet, and what a half inch lag holds in dry pine. This is the number that usually decides the answer, and it is the one nobody prints on a box.
One casting, held in a fixture, pulled straight down through the loop until something gives. It tells you the metal is not the weak part, which is genuinely useful. It tells you nothing about a lag screw in forty year old pine, about a knot next to the hole you drilled, or about the sideways yank a nine year old puts through a swing going up the side of the frame.
Load in a real swing is not a steady weight either. A child pumping puts several times their own weight through the hardware at the bottom of the arc, in pulses, thousands of times a season. That is a fatigue question, and a single pull test is not designed to answer it.
Backyard swing hardware capacity is not set by any standard we can point you at. The CPSC handbook is written for public playgrounds and covers layout, clearances and fall surfacing rather than hardware ratings. ASTM F1148 is a voluntary consumer standard, behind a paywall, built around finished home sets. Neither one hands you a number for a hanger bolted to your own beam.
So when a catalogue prints a figure in a big font, the honest reading is attribution: that is what the maker measured, on their rig, on that part. It is not a certificate and it is not permission.
In the beam and in the fixing. A 4x6 spanning ten feet, a half inch lag in dry pine, the depth of thread actually biting into sound wood: these decide the answer long before the casting is anywhere near its rig figure. The weakest link in a backyard swing is almost never the metal, and that is exactly why we do not lead with the metal figure.
What follows from that is practical. Look at the wood before you look at the hardware. Use the longest fixing that suits the timber. Put a wrench on it in spring, and look at the wood around each hole for a split running with the grain.
The one decision that gets made wrong most often, and the published numbers that settle it.
Pilot sizes, penetration, and the order of operations that keeps a bracket from cracking.
A frame rarely breaks. It walks, it rocks, and on one side it lifts. That is an anchoring problem, not a strength problem.